TalentJR

Social Influence and Group Processes – Class 12 Psychology Chapter 7 Notes & NCERT PDF

Class 12PsychologyChapter 7NCERT book: Psychology - Class 12

Notes and a simple summary of Chapter 7 of the NCERT Class 12 Psychology book, with the official chapter PDF, flashcards, an MCQ quiz and an AI tutor for your doubts.

🎧 Listen to the content

Chapter 7: Social Influence and Group Processes

Introduction

Chapter 7 of NCERT Class 12 Psychology begins with your everyday life: you interact with family in the morning, teachers and classmates at school, and friends in the evening. In each case you are part of a group that gives support and comfort and helps you grow. The chapter asks what groups are, why people join them, how they form and are structured, what types exist, and how groups influence individual behaviour through social loafing and group polarisation. Choose groups that influence you positively.

Key Concepts

What is a Group?

People watching a cricket match are in one place but are not interdependent and have no defined roles or expectations. Family, class and playgroup show mutual interdependence, roles, status differentials and expectations. The book's definition: a group is an organised system of two or more individuals, who are interacting and interdependent, who have common motives, have a set of role relationships among its members, and have norms that regulate the behaviour of its members.

Salient characteristics: a social unit of two or more individuals who perceive themselves as belonging to it; common motives and goals; interdependence (a dropped catch affects the whole team); members satisfying needs through joint association influence each other; direct or indirect interaction; interactions structured by roles and norms.

Groups versus other collections:

  • Crowd — people present by chance (at an accident); no structure or belongingness; behaviour is irrational; no interdependence.
  • Team — a special group with complementary skills, a common goal, mutual accountability and positive synergy. In groups, performance depends on individual contributions and the leader holds responsibility; in teams, both individual contributions and teamwork matter and members hold themselves responsible.
  • Audience — assembled for a special purpose; generally passive but may turn into a mob.
  • Mob — definite sense of purpose, polarisation of attention, homogeneity of thought and behaviour, and impulsivity.
  • Why Do People Join Groups?

    Security (less insecurity and vulnerability), status (pride when your school wins an inter-institutional debate), self-esteem (positive social identity), satisfaction of psychological and social needs (belongingness, attention, love, power), goal achievement (power in the majority) and knowledge and information. Being members of many groups at once can create competing demands.

    Group Formation

    Conditions that facilitate interaction:

  • Proximity — repeated interaction in the same colony, school or playground.
  • Similarity — people prefer consistent relationships, and similar people validate our opinions and values.
  • Common motives and goals — forming a group of friends to teach children in a slum area.
  • Stages of Group Formation — Tuckman

    Tuckman suggested five stages:

  • Forming — uncertainty about the group and goal; excitement and apprehension.
  • Storming — intragroup conflict about how to reach the goal, who controls resources and who does what; a leadership hierarchy emerges.
  • Norming — norms develop, giving a positive group identity.
  • Performing — accepted structure; the group works towards its goal (the last stage for some groups).
  • Adjourning — the group disbands once the task is over (e.g. a function's organising committee).
  • Groups do not always move systematically; stages may overlap, repeat or be skipped.

    Group Structure

    Four elements:

  • Roles — socially defined expectations to be fulfilled in a situation (the role of a son or daughter carries role expectations).
  • Norms — expected standards of behaviour and belief established, agreed upon and enforced by members; a group's 'unspoken rules'.
  • Status — relative social position; ascribed (for example, through seniority) or achieved (through expertise or hard work). The cricket captain has higher status.
  • Cohesiveness — togetherness, mutual attraction, 'we feeling'. Highly cohesive groups are hard to leave or enter. Extreme cohesiveness can lead to groupthink.
  • Box 7.1 — Groupthink (Irving Janis): the group's concern for unanimity overrides realistic appraisal of alternatives, leading to irrational, uncritical decisions. Signs: appearance of consensus, no dissent, exaggerated sense of power, ignoring danger cues. Likely in homogeneous, cohesive groups isolated from outsiders. Example: the escalation of the Vietnam War (1964–1967) by President Lyndon Johnson and his advisors, with the loss of 56,000 American and over one million Vietnamese lives. Prevention: reward critical thinking and disagreement, present alternatives, invite outside experts, seek feedback from trusted others.

    Types of Groups

  • Primary and secondary — primary groups are pre-existing and usually given (family, caste, religion); face-to-face, close, warm bonds; boundaries less permeable; central in developing values early in life. Secondary groups are joined by choice (political party); relationships are impersonal, indirect and less frequent; easy to leave and join.
  • Formal and informal — formal groups have explicitly stated functions, rules and definite roles (office organisation, university); informal groups are not based on rules and have close relationships.
  • Ingroup and outgroup — 'we' versus 'they'. Ingroup members are seen as similar and favourable; outgroup members are often perceived negatively. These categories are created by us; India's composite culture celebrates plurality.
  • Box 7.2 — Minimal Group Paradigm (Tajfel and colleagues): British schoolboys were divided by preference for paintings by Vassily Kandinsky or Paul Klee. Identities were hidden by code numbers, yet when distributing money the boys favoured their own group — even on such a flimsy criterion with no history or future.

    Influence of Group on Individual Behaviour

    Two situations: performing alone in the presence of others (social facilitation) and performing along with others in a larger group (social loafing).

    Social facilitation: presence of others causes arousal and can enhance performance when a person is already good at the task and efforts are individually evaluated.

    Social loafing: reduction in individual effort on a collective task where outputs are pooled — tug-of-war is the example; members can become 'free riders'. Latane and associates asked male students to clap or cheer as loudly as possible alone or in groups of two, four and six; total noise rose, but noise per person fell as group size increased.

  • Why it occurs: members feel less responsible; contributions are not individually evaluated; group performance is not compared with other groups; poor coordination; belonging to the group is unimportant.
  • How to reduce it: make each person's effort identifiable; increase pressure to work hard; increase the apparent importance of the task; make people feel their contribution matters; strengthen cohesiveness.
  • Group Polarisation

    Groups are more likely to take extreme decisions than individuals. Group polarisation is the strengthening of the group's initial position as a result of group interaction and discussion (colleagues deciding the punishment for a bribe-taking employee may let her/him go scot-free or terminate her/him). Using the capital punishment example, it occurs because: (i) like-minded people provide newer arguments for your view; (ii) seeing others agree feels like public validation — a bandwagon effect; (iii) you perceive them as ingroup, identify with them and conform.

    Examples & Activities from the Text

  • Activity 7.1 — form a 10-member committee to plan an open house and observe Tuckman's stages.
  • Activity 7.2 — describe your school and a rival school after an inter-institutional competition; compare ingroup and outgroup descriptions.
  • Activity 7.3 — attitude scale on capital punishment, discussion in separate groups, re-test to see if positions harden.
  • Project: compare Indian and rival commentators' reviews of a recent cricket Test series.
  • Key-Facts Sheet

  • Group = organised system of two or more interacting, interdependent individuals with common motives, roles and norms.
  • Tuckman: forming → storming → norming → performing → adjourning.
  • Four structural elements: roles, norms, status, cohesiveness.
  • Groupthink — Irving Janis; Vietnam War 1964–67.
  • Minimal group paradigm — Tajfel; Kandinsky vs Klee.
  • Social loafing — Latane; clapping/cheering, groups of 2, 4 and 6.
  • Group polarisation: new arguments, bandwagon effect, ingroup identification.
  • Board Exam Focus

    Review questions cover types of groups, reasons for joining, Tuckman's model, group influence and social loafing.

    Answer outline — "How does Tuckman's stage model help you understand group formation?" Groups develop, not instantly formed → five stages with one line each (forming, storming, norming, performing, adjourning) → note that stages may overlap, repeat or be skipped → apply to a school committee.

    Answer outline — "How can social loafing be reduced?" Define social loafing with tug-of-war → Latane's clapping study → reasons → five remedies (identifiable effort, pressure/commitment, task importance, value of individual contribution, cohesiveness) → a school project example.

    Answer outline — "Compare primary and secondary groups." Given vs. chosen membership → face-to-face warmth vs. impersonal relations → less vs. more permeable boundaries → examples: family, caste, religion vs. a political party.

    Key Terms

  • Group — समूह
  • Crowd — भीड़
  • Team — टोली (दल)
  • Mob — उपद्रवी भीड़
  • Proximity — निकटता
  • Norms — मानक
  • Roles — भूमिकाएँ
  • Status — प्रतिष्ठा (स्थिति)
  • Cohesiveness — संसक्तता
  • Groupthink — समूह सोच
  • Ingroup / Outgroup — अंतःसमूह / बाह्यसमूह
  • Social facilitation — सामाजिक सुकरीकरण
  • Social loafing — सामाजिक स्वैराचार (सामाजिक श्रमावनयन)
  • Group polarisation — समूह ध्रुवीकरण
  • Interdependence — अंतर्निर्भरता
  • Common Mistakes

  • Calling any collection of people a group — a crowd or audience lacks interdependence, roles and norms.
  • Mixing the order of Tuckman's stages — storming comes before norming.
  • Thinking cohesiveness is always good — extreme cohesiveness can cause groupthink.
  • Confusing groupthink (appearance of consensus, suppressed dissent) with group polarisation (initial position becomes more extreme after discussion).
  • Believing social loafing means the group produces less in total — total output can rise while each member's effort falls.
  • Treating ingroup-outgroup categories as natural facts — the book stresses they are created by us.
  • 💡 Key Learning Points

    • ✓Define a group and distinguish it from a crowd, team, audience and mob.
    • ✓Explain why people join groups and the conditions for group formation.
    • ✓Describe Tuckman's five stages and the four elements of group structure, including groupthink.
    • ✓Differentiate primary/secondary, formal/informal and ingroup/outgroup, with Tajfel's minimal group paradigm.
    • ✓Explain social facilitation, social loafing (Latane) and group polarisation, with remedies.

    👨‍🏫 Teaching Tips

    • →Run a quick clapping or rope-pull demonstration to show social loafing, then discuss remedies.
    • →Let a class committee plan an event and observe Tuckman's stages (Activity 7.1).
    • →Contrast groupthink and group polarisation side by side, since students often merge them.

    📋 Assessment Questions

    1. Explain Tuckman's stage model with an example from school.
    2. How can social loafing be reduced? Describe Latane's study.
    3. Compare formal and informal groups, and ingroups and outgroups.

    👩‍🏫 Class 12 Psychology classes near you — online or at home

    Prefer a real teacher? TalentJR teachers take live online classes anywhere in India and visit homes in selected cities. Tell us what you need and our team will call you with timings and fees.

    • Live online classesSmall groups or 1:1 with a teacher, from home, any city.
    • Teacher at homeA TalentJR teacher visits your home (selected cities).
    • At a centreClasses at a TalentJR partner centre near you, where available.